Category: Free Law Essay Samples

Elizabeth Bathory, also known by “Blood Countess”, was a historical vampire who tortured and killed between 100 and 650 girls between 1590-1610. Hungarian noblewoman and serial killer is well-known. She may have had a role in her family’s childhood. Some myths are a result of her actions. Although it is impossible to tell where truth ends from fiction in Elizabeth Bathory’s tale, the legend of Elizabeth Bathory continues.

Elizabeth Bathory was the daughter of a powerful Protestant family, which was one Hungary’s most influential families at the time. She was born August 7, 1560. Baron George Bathory was her father and Baroness Anna Bathory was her mother. It is possible that Elizabeth’s seizures, loss-of-control, and fits rage stemmed from her early years. As a young child, she was subject to brutal punishments by her family’s estate officers. One account describes how a gypsy accused with theft was left to die after being sewn in the stomach a dying horse. Some of her relatives were disturbing too, such as her uncle who taught her Satanism and her aunt who taught sadomasochism to her. (Medical Bag) Bathory was just 11 years old when Ferenc was born to another Hungarian noble family. They married at Csejthe Castle when she was 15. Ferenc reportedly showed Bathory his methods of punishing servants. He built a torture chamber for her to please him. Elizabeth was a caring mother who loved her children and was kind to her servants. Ferenc and Elizabeth believed in discipline. Hungarians were not afraid to punish maids who broke the law or had misbehaved. However, it became difficult to distinguish between torture and discipline at some point. (Britannica). Star kicking was a common method of discipline that Elizabeth learned from Ferenc. A maid would get tied up and oil-soaked paper placed between her toes. The papers would then go on fire. Star kicking was the servant’s favorite pastime. (History footage.) Elizabeth’s evil deeds were not revealed until her husband’s death in the 1600’s. (Medical bag)

In order to aid her torture, she moved to Cachtice, a castle in northwest Hungary. Legend has it that Elizabeth was being brushed by an attendant girl when she pulled on her hair too hard. The countess became angry and jumped up to strike the girl with her back. The strike was so intense that it made Elizabeth bleed. Elizabeth noticed later that her skin where the blood was left looked younger than it had in many years. This led her to believe that if so little blood can make her hand look young, then she could have more to restore her youthfulness. This is where the madness started and Elizabeth began to bathe in blood from virgin girls. (Medical bag)

Villages far and near began to see young women and children disappearing. They were lured by the castle and promised work. But they were never seen again. They were put in a basement while they waited to be tortured when they arrived. Elizabeth was often the one who carried out the torture and beat the girls to their deaths. Sometimes she would force girls to eat their own flesh, or even sew their mouths shut. (Rejected princesses) Elizabeth would command her servants that a girl be brought up to her quarters by her servants. She would then bite their faces and shoulders. Other times, she would place needles under the fingertips of the girl and then cut off fingers who attempted to remove them. (History) Elizabeth quickly ran out young women. She had either taken them before or the villagers started hiding their daughters to protect them from her. This was when Elizabeth began to look for noble girls. It would be her final act of defiance. The authorities finally took action after Elizabeth attempted to commit suicide by attempting to murder one noble girl in 1609.

Officials raided the castle at night and found the bodies of several young girls. Some had no arms or eyes. One of the bodies was still inside the fireplace. Elizabeth was brought before the jury and witnesses included her servants, survivors, and others. (CNN] One of the servants stated that the girls were tied up to death and had their skin torn and battered. One girl was subject to 200 beatings before she died. One servant confessed that she had used red-hot pokers to shovel red-hot pokers into the mouths of one girl. She stated that she put her fingers into the mouth of one girl and pulled until both sides cracked open.

Elizabeth and her servants were convicted for 80 murder counts, but evidence indicated that up to 650 female victims may have been killed. (CNN). Elizabeth was sentenced to life imprisonment in a room within her castle, which was boarded and secured with tiny air and food slits. Elizabeth lived three and a half more years before being found face down on the ground. (History footage). Countess Elizabeth Bathory was killed in a car accident.

A misdemeanor refers to a lesser-severe criminal offense than a felony and more severe than an infraction. They are typically punishable with a fine and time in jail in the local county jail. These convictions are generally dismissed as low-level events that don’t deserve the attention they get. Petty misdemeanors typically result in a six-month sentence.

A further 10 million cases are brought to court each year due to its high number of felonies. The petty offences process is also a major problem for Americans in the criminal justice systems. The United States has no convictions for misdemeanors. Although felony adjudication is used, misdemeanor process is largely informal. This results in high-volume arrests as well as weak prosecutorial screening, poor defense bars and high pleas rates. Even though misdemeanors don’t amount to major crimes, these small petty crimes like theft, vandalism, public intoxication and vandalism can impact employment, housing, and educational opportunities. “Misdemeanors.” The burden of petty convictions is growing, even though institutions are able to provide less support. Misdemeanors could have grave implications. It has become doubtful that thousands may be guilty of these crimes.

People of color are represented in every stage of criminal justice, from arrest to incarceration. The majority of those involved are minorities. It is not surprising that minorities are more likely to be detained as juveniles, which gives the government greater authority to hold those wrongfully detained. According to this report, 297 DNA exonerations show that approximately 70% are minorities. Similar, the vast majority of these exemptions go to African Americans. Bureau of Justice Statistics has shown that minorities are incarcerated and arrested at higher rates than Hispanics and Whites. Both rich and poor countries can have organized crime. This is an important issue that we witness. These crimes can be found in numerous cities and states. The United States saw organized crime flourish during prohibition. Merriam-Webster Dictionary describes organized crime as “criminal activities that are planned, controlled, and scaled by powerful groups.” It is a group of people who work together for the sole purpose of carrying out at least one serious offense, or to acquire financial assets.

Prohibition changed criminals to capitalists. The Eighteenth amended made “the production and transport of alcohol (though they were not for the consumption or possession) illegal.” These gangs were making huge amounts of money. They were able to work more efficiently. This is how gangs became a more sophisticated criminal operation.

In all cases, organized criminals may be either loosely or tightly organized. Although there are many ways that organized crime can be formed, the most important thing is how it is structured. Each organization is unique. A common form of leadership is a single leader. It has features that are similar to an Egyptian pyramid. The body is made up of street soldiers and a hierarchy that is topped off by a leader and, finally, a boss/king. This structure shows loyalty and protects those in the top.

Blackmail is often used by criminals in organizations to obtain money, power, or other dangers. Organizations and individuals are often victimized by the organization. This includes stealing their cars, theft, fraud and falsifying cash, as well as rigging open tasks. This is how these criminal organizations use brutality to get their needs met. True mischief can come from people who don’t agree with their orders or those who don’t do their jobs properly. Organized crime groups are able to get money by drug trafficking or smuggling weapons and arms. The illegal money smuggled is not allowed to be banked.

Criminal groups often combine legitimate businesses with their operations in order to get the money. This reduces suspicion from law enforcement authorities. Laundering money and changing the money into useful assets, such as vehicles, property, or other tangible goods. In 1975, an investigation was made into this rapidly-growing crime. After conducting research, it was discovered that organized criminal activity amounts to more then $50 billion per year.

There are several reasons organized crime flourished in America. One reason is the terrorizing, dangers and death. This is done to ensure their victims, witnesses and own members don’t testify. The jury tampering is another way. These gangs sought to avoid being involved in any way with the police or the courts. The gangs used large sums of cash to gain political power at both the national and local level. Another option was to invest in legitimate businesses.

Table of Contents

Inaugural speech

A study of the existing literature

Original: The literature review revealed several key findings

Paraphrased: The analysis of the literature revealed some major discoveries.

In conclusion

Cites

Introduction

This is the introductory section of the document.

Most people are fascinated by serial killers. Why do they kill? Was this their natural desire to kill? We need to know if serial killers are born or made. The truth is that infamous serial killers Ted Bundy, Richard Ramirez and others are dead. Because society must be educated about serial killers, the question of nature versus nurturing needs to been addressed.

A study of existing literature

Original: The research indicated that there was a lack of understanding in the area of study.

Paraphrased: It was found that the area of study was not well comprehended.

Johnson and Becker (1997) begin their article explaining the foundation of Natural Born Killers. This implies that the main characters would end up as they did. This article examines whether it is possible to predict the likelihood of young people becoming homicidal. The researchers do this by studying case studies. Johnson and Becker reviewed 9 cases. The first case was L, a fourteen year-old white male. The researcher also heard that he fantasized about his mother’s death. This study looked at the cases and compared them to different types of serial killers. This article focuses mainly on nature. There are reasons why each killer is classified. L, for example, had a fantasizing about killing his mother based on Johnson and Becker (1997). Research has also shown that sexually sadistic killers are often in mixed relationships with mothers and fathers, have poor social skills, and can be commanding. Johnson and Becker (1997) concluded that the desire to kill is a common trait in infants. They believe more research is needed to understand why this happens. Miller, 2013, states that serial killers have a rich history dating back to the Ancient Roman Emperors. Looking at serial killers’ nature, the demographic is dominated by white men in their 20s and 40s. Known serial killers are known to have no criminal record, but they start committing crimes and display antisocial behavior after being caught (Miller 2013, 2013). Although the article doesn’t go into the details of the origins of a serial killer, it does observe how serial killers treat victims’ bodies and compares it to early societies. This article supports the evolution theory that serial killers seek to inflict pain on others. Miller (2013) asserts that killing, dismembering sexing with and eating victims is part of their survival need. Miller (2013) also identifies serial killers by identifying the characteristics and types. Although their research doesn’t answer the question of whether serial killers are born from nature or nurture, it addresses the important issue that serial killers share some commonalities in order to identify them. Part two will discuss the development factors that lead to serial killers. It will also address nature vs. nurture. Scott (2008) explains that serial killers usually follow a pattern when they kill. They often have ulterior motives for their crimes and feel the need of dominating their victims. Also, they are often distant from their victims. According to Scott (2008), the typical serial killer is a white, middle-class man, often in his twenties, or thirties. Scott, 2008 also notes that many serial killings occurred as children. As everyone knows, there is no specific marker that can distinguish between serial killers and non-serial killers. Scott (2008) states that serial killers are difficult to identify because of their psychopathic nature. They lack empathy and can kill others. However, this does not mean they will stand out from the crowd. Instead, they mimic other emotions. Scott (2008) explores the possibility that some people may believe some children are born evil or good, but it all depends on the child. Scott (2008) uses Ed Kemper’s killing spree as an example.

Barbie dolls and the fantasies of murdering his 2nd-grade teacher. However, there are also some evidence to support the idea that nurture can lead to serial killers. Albert DeSalvo, better known as the Boston Strangler or the Boston Strangler was sold by his abusive father as an slave (Scott, 2008). This article shows that serial killers can be a mixture of nurture and nature. Scott (2008) argues that the majority of serial killers have psychopathic tendencies. They kill to satisfy a need and do not view their victims as human beings. Pilson (2011) has shown that serial murderers are a mixture of nurture and nature. But it is the nurture that is most responsible for creating them. Pilson (2011) points out Jack the Ripper’s case. He was a serial killer as a result of the city environment he lived. A person’s economic background can also support the notion that nurture is the key to making them a serial killer. Harold Shipman was another serial killer. He was also a doctor that killed his patients then put himself in their wills to gain financial gain. Pilson (2011) says that both nurture (and nature) can make someone a serial killer. However she prefers to look at the primary reason why people kill. Jeffrey Dahmer became serial killer after feeling isolated throughout his youth, which led to him becoming violent. Mitchell and Aamodt (2005, p. 4) acknowledge that serial killers are often a result of child abuse. Mitchell & Aamodt, 2005. Mitchell and Aamodt, 2005, examined the motivations of serial killers. They only considered those who wanted to be able to observe whether they had been abused as children. Mitchell and Aamodt (2006) compared the data and discovered that serial killers are not always caused by child abuse. However, they found that there is a significantly higher number of serial killers whose childhoods were abused than the general population. Mehra Pirouz and Samavati pirouz (2012) write that serial killers can be attributed to mental disorders. A crime investigator may find it difficult to discern a serial killer’s motivation. It may be difficult to identify a criminal’s motives because they are not easily visible. And those with mental disorders might not take responsibility for their crimes. Psychopathy, which is defined as a mental disorder, is common in serial killers. Psychopaths are not able to empathize, they are impulsive, and seek control (Mehra-Samavati Pirouz (2012)). The article goes on to describe the characteristics that make psychopaths a serial killer. They are charismatic, mysterious, and violent. This work considers both nurture and nature because psychopathy is not yet understood. Stone (2001), discusses serial killers’ history and why they are often called “serial”. Stone, 2001. Killings are spaced apart and isolated. This article examines the nature of killing. Stone (2001), recalls that an FBI investigation revealed that most serial killers were forced to witness child abuse and neglect. Stone (2011) further reveals that serial killers who were children were also deviant and had killed animals as they grew up. Injuries and illnesses that occur after birth fall under the nurture umbrella. Stone (2001), for example, uses Fred West. Fred West was injured in a motorbike accident at the age of 17 and then began to exhibit personality shifts. After he began to feel moody and had random outbursts, it was discovered that he was molesting young girls and became a serial killer. Although this article doesn’t provide much information about serial killers, it does give some insight into the factors that could lead to them killing.

In conclusion,

It is vital to research the nature and nurture of serial killers. This will help society to better understand potential risk factors that could lead to multiple murders within a short time. Psychopathy is often linked to serial killers. This can help people identify symptoms and make it easier for them to be treated. The mental health and criminal justice authorities can benefit from research that examines the nature versus nurture for serial killers.

While not all victims of abuse as children go on to become serial murderers, some people who aren’t able to address their issues will. Although it is unclear whether serial killers are born or nurtured, research can be used to help professionals identify them and treat any mental health issues. Psychopaths can be criminals or serial killers, so further research on them should be done.

Many people today are trying to lose weight. Some are on a diet, while others are exercising. You need to exercise in order to improve or sustain your health. You can be fit and healthy by exercising. It is the restriction or limitation of food intake that does not provide sufficient nutrients to support good health. One person’s diet should be balanced so that she can achieve a healthy and positive result. Many people want to lose weight fast. For some, changing one’s eating habits will be better than doing exercise. Which is the best way to lose weight? Which one is better? After we examine the contrast between exercise and diet, we will be able to answer these questions.

Exercise and dieting share the same goals. It is to help you lose weight and get healthier. Both methods are effective, but each person’s body is different. They will work together and provide healthier bodies. However, not everyone can do both exercise and dieting. It is a difficult task for them. They will decide to do one or the other. Both of these strategies are difficult but worthwhile. While both strategies can be hard, if someone is determined and focused on achieving his weight loss goal, they are possible. It’s said, “No pain is no gain.” You have to make the effort to change your eating habits. The other challenge with dieting is the effort you put into it. Exercise is a different challenge. It requires you to exercise and spend the time to feel pain. These strategies can be discouraged or encouraged by only one person: you. Self motivation is crucial for your weight loss success. Both exercising and dieting have the same requirements. You must be determined, hardworking, and willing to take on all challenges. These two can both affect the person’s weight.

Although they share some similarities in certain areas, there are still differences between them. The first diet focuses only on healthy eating habits for weight loss, while exercise focuses on improving the body’s structure and composition. When you’re exercising, you only need to focus on making your body attractive and beautiful. Some people feel tired after doing exercise, but that’s not always the case. In dieting, however, you can eat as much food as you like later because I’ll be exercising. These strategies are not excuses. You must be motivated and determined if you want to do something. For example, exercising requires more motivation than dieting. Exercise is more manageable than diet. You can do diet in your own home. However, exercise is best done outdoors. This is why dieting is so popular than exercising.

Although exercise and dieting are two different things, when they’re combined they can produce more beneficial outcomes for one’s health. They can be combined to promote weight maintenance. Both have long-term weight loss benefits. Despite their differences both of them are working together to improve the health and well-being of people. Both can help people live a healthy lifestyle. Exercise and dieting are two ways to promote healthy living. It is a great decision to make. It also helps you to avoid future sickness. This is similar to saving your life and health from any harm. We must remember that these are two things that we must do, but not in a way that is too forceful. It is safer to consult your doctor or check with your doctor before you start any exercise or dieting.

These strategies are designed to be beneficial for our bodies. Dieting is an option for those who are unable to exercise.

For weight loss to be a success, you need to put in the effort and work. You can’t achieve your goals if you don’t give your time and effort. You can lose weight without diet. However, exercise is more effective and faster than diet. You will be healthier, more efficient, and faster. Exercise and diting both are vital for our health. These two are essential to our health and physical fitness.

The American justice systems is among the most respected in the world. It has changed a lot since its creation in the United States over 200 years ago. It is less biased and more professional than it was in slavery. Experience is the key to everything that happens in court today. You’ve heard the saying, “Practice makes perfect,” and courts have seen a greater number of cases over the years. America has seen many landmark cases, mostly at its Supreme Court, which have helped to shape the country we know today. These cases have dealt with everything from racism (Korematsu V. US), to murder cases involving very famous celebrities (The People of the State of California against OJ Simpson). These cases all share one thing: the way evidence was collected. Mapp, v. Ohio shows that almost all cases involve some sort of tangible evidence. Every law enforcement officer who seeks evidence has to be able to get search warrants because of this case. This case helped shape today’s justice system.

Dollree mapp

What makes a case landmark? It is the case type? Or what was the end result? Or perhaps even the subject of the case? Mapp V. Ohio was a mixture of all three. The case of Mapp v. Ohio saw a black woman defend the law in the midst of one of America’s most difficult decades. Many also consider it to have launched the ‘due-process revolution’ in American justice. Although many people believe this case is the most significant US case since the Constitution was ratified, it was decided 50 years ago. This important outcome meant that any state official could search private property without a search permit from the court. This ruling has made America a democracy and protected citizens’ rights. This ruling is perhaps the most important in world justice. Dollree Mapp was a Mississippi native who became pregnant at the age of 17 without the support of her father. (Mapp, 2018). After her move to Cleveland, she continued living a lavish life by relating herself to prominent boxers. Mapp left Cleveland to pursue her business dreams. She launched one after another. Some of them were legit, others were just part and parcel of her imagination. After her divorce, she moved back to Cleveland in Ohio with Jimmy Bivins, a great boxer. Mapp claimed that Bivins had defeated her, which resulted in a messy divorce. Mapp became engaged to Archie Moore shortly after her divorce. But, they never got married. Moore was sued later by Mapp for breaching her promise. All these experiences led her to making history. Dollree Mapping did the almost unimaginable. In the 1950s-1960s, she stood up to white police.

Mapp’s 1957 year would have been a shock to none of her friends. Mapp was described as “brilliant”, “bright,” and “beautiful” by her niece. (Mapp 2018, 2018). Mapp was taken care of by her niece in her later years. Mapp was just saying yes to all of her closest friends. The police in Cleveland were also investigating an alleged bombing at Don King’s home, a prominent boxing promoter. Dollree Mesep was allegedly the hiding place of the bomber, according to police. Three officers arrived at her front door and demanded that she be allowed in. She refused to allow the police in and called her lawyer. Alexander Kearns, her lawyer, advised her to reject the police officers and allow them into her home only if they had a search warrant. Kearns told her that even if they had brought a warrant, she would have to go through it and verify it was legitimate. Mapp kept her door locked as more officers arrived to Mapp’s house. Three hours later, one of the police officers obtained a’search warrant’. A total of 15 officers were now requesting to be allowed in with the’search warrant’. Mapp was confronted by a lieutenant who stood right in front her and waved his search warrant.

Mapp asked for the search warrant to be read by the lieutenant, but he refused. Mapp then grabbed the warrant from the hand of the lieutenant and placed it in his blouse. After much confusion, a lieutenant ran after Mapp and took the warrant out of his hands. They forced their way in to her home and ransacked every inch of it, even though they didn’t find any obvious suspects. The sergeant who took Mapp’s search warrant from Mapp’s blouse discovered a box containing obscene materials. It contained nude sketches as well as four books considered ‘improper’. Mapp explained to police that the items were not hers. They belonged to her former roommate. She claimed she kept them as they were not hers to throw away. Mapp was allegedly unable to resist the constant stream of officers who repeatedly rejected her for their obscene materials.

America was plagued with mass-murderers and tragedies between the 1970s & 1990s. The country was exposed to heartless and horrible people such as Charles Manson, Richard Ramirez (Zodiac Killer), John Wayne Gacy, and Richard Ramirez. Although they are quite different, I was able to see many similarities in Ted Bundy’s and Jeffrey Dahmer’s murderers.

Jeffrey Dahmer, a cannibal, kept and ate different parts of the victims. Between 1978 and 1981, he murdered 17 teenage men and boys. His later murders were often linked to necrophilia.

Ted Bundy was a law-student who raped and killed more than 35 women across Colorado, Idaho, Utah, Utah, and Washington. Bundy spent three decades living in Philadelphia at the home of Samuel Cowell and Eleanor Cowell. He was raised by them to avoid any stigmas that would have accompanied Bundy’s true mother’s pregnancy outside of wedlock.

Despite what appeared perfect from the outside, it was quite the opposite inside. Bundy recalls Samuel, Bundy’s grandfather, as being violent and belligerent. Friends and family described Eleanor as timid and submissive, while his grandfather Samuel was violent and belligerent. For depression, she was often subject to electroconvulsive treatment. At a young age, Bundy showed alarming signs. Julia, his aunt, recalls Bundy smiling and waking up to find her head surrounded with knives. Dahmer learned that his “sister”, in fact, was his mother. After that, she married Johnny. They had 4 children. Ted was far from his siblings and his parents during his teenage years. He was often seen in the trash bins of others looking for magazines and photos of naked women. He was also passionate about crime fiction and reading about the cases. He was quiet throughout high school and didn’t have a lot of social interaction. Bundy went on to major in Psychology at Washington University. He was an honors student who was well respected by his professors. But he was rejected by the first woman he loved. He began killing students and local women at night. Later, he went to law school in Utah. He also continued to kill there.

Jeffrey Dahmer’s childhood was quite unusual. His parents were both very busy when he was a kid. His father attended Marquette University and majored in Chemistry, while his mother was extremely anxious. Joyce Dahmer, Dahmer’s mom, attempted suicide once by taking too much prescription medication. Dahmer had a passion for dead animals even as he was a child. His passion for science and his early cruelty towards animals led to him becoming a scientist. He was able to remove the flesh and connective tissues from dead rodents that were under his house. Lionel, his research chemist father, taught him this skill. Although he had learned these tactics early in life, he retained them enough to be able use them against his victims. In grade school, when he was still in elementary school, he gave an uncooked tadpole to the teacher. She then gave it to a different student. He was furious and set fire to the tank by pouring gasoline into it. When he was a teenager, these actions continued when he hit a dog with a stick and impaled its head in the forest behind home. These were not the only actions. He continued to act recklessly. Some believe that Dahmer may have been fascinated by dead animals from the moment he witnessed his father remove bones from his basement. Jeffrey was, according to Dahmer’s dad, “oddly excited” at the sound made by bone. Early signs of unusual interest were evident. Jeffrey was initially considered an outcast in high school. Peers recall Dahmer’s drinking habits at school. He also found this time very confusing. Dahmer was a homosexual. He was a class clown, but his peers still recognized him for it. Jeffrey’s parents split in the middle of their high school success. Jeffrey’s father Lionel, after many unsuccessful counseling sessions, left the house. Joyce Dahmer, Jeffrey’s mother, moved out of the house with her son. Jeffrey was left alone in the family home. His wildest dreams were realized and he was finally able to fulfill them. He was first hitchhiker to a male victim and things went from there.

The parents of both the gruesome murderers had suffered from mental disorders. Bundy had a depressed mother, and Dahmer was anxious. Both were serial killers who did not understand others, as it is obvious. Both were also very impressionable children. Ted grew up knowing that his father was his grandfather. Jeffrey’s experience with his father breaking bones stayed with them for all time and eventually led to something even worse. However, Bundy and Dahmer both committed suicide to obtain sexual pleasure. Dahmer said that he enjoyed the control of sexual acts and wanted to be able to control his sexual partners. Bundy stated the same thing. He enjoyed sexual arousal by killing and mutilating females. Both men were clearly psychopaths. While they looked more normal than most people, they did not hide their evil intentions. Both Bundy and Dahmer didn’t have a concept of love, I think. Bundy and Dahmer grew up without a lot tender loving care.

These men’s differences are starkly polarized in many ways. Ted and Jeffrey were able to target different “types”. Bundy had very similar looks to all of his victims. Bundy’s “type” was young blonde women with a parted middle. People believe it was because his “type” was a young woman with blonde hair and a part down the middle. However, most of Dahmer’s victims were young gay men. Dahmer was attracted to young men and desired to have sexual relations with them.

These two people were made to be killers. Others may argue that their childhoods were the catalyst. It could also be a combination. It is a matter of nurture or nature. It was a mixture of nurture and nature, I believe. This is because I have watched in-depth documentaries and researched the men. Despite having traumatic childhoods, both of them tested positive for mental disorders. Their mothers also had mental disorders so it makes sense that they would have mental disorders.

This concludes the analyzation on Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer. America was plagued for over 20 years by these two monsters. Bundy was convicted and sentenced to the death Penalty. He was executed by an electric chair in 1989. The same charges were brought against Dahmer. He was sentenced for life imprisonment, but was then brutally killed by an insider in 1994. These men were discovered by researchers.

Merton’s Strain Theory, which is generally found in sociology as well as criminology, states that society places certain pressures, known collectively, on individuals to achieve socially acceptable goals. Even though the American dream is possible, some individuals may turn to crime to fulfill their social expectations. Everybody strives to reach their goals. However, when society’s goals are not achievable for large numbers of people, criminal activity can be an alternative way of achieving those goals. In particular, the United States has issues with wage gaps and income inequality. This makes it difficult for many Americans to feel like their quality life is not as good as they imagine. The theory may be different, but all attempts to answer the question: Can society and its demands really cause ordinary citizens not to commit crimes. Should individuals be held responsible for all crimes or is society required to reconsider its standards and take some responsibility, especially during times of mass imprisonments and miscarriages.

Society should take some responsibility for criminal behavior. Because society’s societal constructs are what causes so many people to be unhappy with the quality and standard of life they have. These underprivileged people turn to crime in order to improve their lives and increase their chances of achieving the status they desire. People turn to crime for the opportunity to get rich quick. The lure of the promise of better lives and a chance to be rich is what drives them to participate in illegal activities such as larceny and drug trafficking. To temporarily solve a problem, an individual without income would have to commit a crime. As a result, they would face harsh punishments that would reflect the severity of the crime. Nicole Rafter’s textbook describes strain theory as a concept that explains how society forces ordinary Americans into committing crimes in order to fit the lifestyle of the wealthy. The ordinary citizen is subject to these pressures as they have to face hardships and difficulties in order to live a happy life. These ideals of living a meaningful, fulfilling life are reflected in society’s expectations. They can be summarized as the American dream: A large, picket-fenced home, two cars and a great career. The middle-class is where most Americans struggle to get in and are the easiest to leave. The reason is that the labor market has high levels of competition, there is very little job availability, and systemic discrimination is prevalent in all areas of socioeconomic related to minorities. This creates a barrier to success.

Means is an important aspect of strain theory. It refers to how someone can achieve culturally-oriented goals. A person’s ability to succeed within a socioeconomic system such as the one in the United States can be determined by their means. If they cannot, they may turn to crime to achieve the cultural standard that society has imposed upon them. The root cause of high levels of crime is often defined as a lack of opportunities.

Deviance is when someone lacks the means to achieve socioeconomic success. Gangs are an example of this. Even though the methods may vary, their purpose is to use criminality as a way to reach the same success. As they try to control illegal industries that include drugs, weapons, prostitution, tensions in competition can play. Deviant subcultures develop from group frustrations and a dysfunctional system. They then take advantage of that broken system to their advantage.

Robert Agnew’s strain theories are slightly different. They focus more on social norms, rather than cultural differences and other social variables. This may impact the development of criminal behaviour. This theory focuses less on infrastructure issues, e.g. education, health etc. The most important thing is to improve your emotional and personal well-being. Jie Zhang’s is also an option.

The Suicide Strain Theory emphasizes more psychological suicides. This theory was established through examination of suicide letters from China and the United States. Individuals are affected by these strains until they believe that there is no other option but to commit suicide.

According to me, there is clear evidence that society is indeed responsible for criminal behavior among citizens who feel there is no alternative to getting to the top. While crime may lead to different destinations, it is the most dangerous route, and can have serious consequences for those who choose to take short-term pleasure. While I agree that society should bear some responsibility, the perpetrator must also be held accountable. They still have the freedom to avoid committing the crime, no mater how serious the situation. While society can shape an individual depending on their situation, level, and opportunity, ultimately the responsibility lies with the individual.